Skip to main content

Mar 15, 2017

Dear Mr. President,

I see that you have decided to cut funding for the Environmental Protection Agency. I'm not so sure that that was such a good idea. I'm really worried because we only have one planet to live on and it only has one environment. That means that it's everyone's responsibility to protect the environment for future generations.

Now I know that back in your day, people didn't really worry about global warming. The emphasis was on the future. There were dreams of going to the moon, floating cars, and pasteurized American cheese-type product. Thankfully, science and industry brought us two of those, but at what cost, Mr. President? Science has progressed now to the point where we can accurately assess the damage done to the environment, and Sir, it's not good. I understand that new science and new ideas are scary, but you should remember that once, those scary ideas were cars, manufacturing, and spray tans. Don't defund science just because it's scary. Trust that someone knows what's going on. Unless you have big plans for Trump-branded, weather-proof city domes. You don't do you?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apr 22, 2017 Part 2

Dear Mr. President, On this Earth Day, it's nice to celebrate the Earth and remind ourselves that it's the only one we've got. It's a chance to think about how we can all make a small difference that will add up to big results later. That's why I was so glad that you responded in such a way to the March for Science. Thank you for indicating the turn around your administration will be making to protect endangered species and further the efforts of those organizations dedicated to preserving the Earth. After all, we're not the only ones using the planet. We've got to think of everyone. I'm so proud of you, Sir. It takes a big man to make such a public change. I eagerly await the new policies.
Post a Comment
Read more

May 3, 2017

Dear Mr. President, In an interview, you had some questions about the Civil War. Namely, why it happened and couldn't be worked out. Well Sir, let me tell you. Half of our country believed that owning a person as property was wrong. The other half were those that owned the slaves. At the heart of the matter was the way people viewed blacks. To the Southern American, a black person was not a person at all. I'm not even sure if they were considered to be as high as livestock, but they were definitely treated like manure. All because of an uncontrollable factor that allowed them to survive in such sunny climates. By that, I mean the color of their skin. One side thought people were nothing more than objects to beat and work to death, and the other side respected the sanctity of life. Those were some very deeply held beliefs Sir, and it is always difficult to change a fundamental opinion. As for Andrew Jackson being upset about the Civil War, he was dead by then. For 1...
Post a Comment
Read more

Apr 26, 2017 Part 1

Dear Mr. President, A disturbing report was brought to my attention today. You have allowed logging in National Parks. Is that true? That can't be true, Sir. Logging would destroy our National Parks. The effect would be terrible, both for the environment and for our reputation. People don't say America the Beautiful because of man-made structures. They say it because our country—YOUR country—is inherently beautiful. It's natural structures are breathtaking. Perhaps if you considered them the Trump Tower of parks. It would be like allowing gold minders into your homes. I've seen pictures. They would strip your home of it's very essence. The same is true of logging in the National Parks. Please don't let us become America the Deforested.
Post a Comment
Read more