Skip to main content

Apr 28, 2017 Part 1

Dear Mr. President,

The White House Correspondent's Dinner is coming up. There are rumors that you won't be attending this year. Sir, that doesn't seem to be the best choice. You see the WHCD began during the Harding administration, though Presidents didn't start going until Coolidge. Still, Sir, it seems a bit rude not to attend. Do you know that this will be the first time in 36 years that a President hasn't attended the dinner? Thirty-six years! That's more than my whole life and just over half of yours.
Please rethink your decision, Mr. President. I know they've been mean and not very fair to you during this period of transition. They should realize how hard it must be to suddenly become not only A politician, but THE politician.
However, I think you could cut them a little slack, too. I think we could call it even after all the times you called the press fake news and got publicly upset with them. Remember Sir, your words carry unprecedented weight. So, what do you say you bury the hatchet and attend the dinner? It would be like a show of good faith—a sign of changing times and positive relationships to come.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apr 22, 2017 Part 2

Dear Mr. President, On this Earth Day, it's nice to celebrate the Earth and remind ourselves that it's the only one we've got. It's a chance to think about how we can all make a small difference that will add up to big results later. That's why I was so glad that you responded in such a way to the March for Science. Thank you for indicating the turn around your administration will be making to protect endangered species and further the efforts of those organizations dedicated to preserving the Earth. After all, we're not the only ones using the planet. We've got to think of everyone. I'm so proud of you, Sir. It takes a big man to make such a public change. I eagerly await the new policies.
Post a Comment
Read more

May 3, 2017

Dear Mr. President, In an interview, you had some questions about the Civil War. Namely, why it happened and couldn't be worked out. Well Sir, let me tell you. Half of our country believed that owning a person as property was wrong. The other half were those that owned the slaves. At the heart of the matter was the way people viewed blacks. To the Southern American, a black person was not a person at all. I'm not even sure if they were considered to be as high as livestock, but they were definitely treated like manure. All because of an uncontrollable factor that allowed them to survive in such sunny climates. By that, I mean the color of their skin. One side thought people were nothing more than objects to beat and work to death, and the other side respected the sanctity of life. Those were some very deeply held beliefs Sir, and it is always difficult to change a fundamental opinion. As for Andrew Jackson being upset about the Civil War, he was dead by then. For 1...
Post a Comment
Read more

Apr 26, 2017 Part 1

Dear Mr. President, A disturbing report was brought to my attention today. You have allowed logging in National Parks. Is that true? That can't be true, Sir. Logging would destroy our National Parks. The effect would be terrible, both for the environment and for our reputation. People don't say America the Beautiful because of man-made structures. They say it because our country—YOUR country—is inherently beautiful. It's natural structures are breathtaking. Perhaps if you considered them the Trump Tower of parks. It would be like allowing gold minders into your homes. I've seen pictures. They would strip your home of it's very essence. The same is true of logging in the National Parks. Please don't let us become America the Deforested.
Post a Comment
Read more